|
Post by jottse3r4uk on Dec 5, 2023 14:07:05 GMT 5.5
The's likely to be discouraged from stealing. fight off disease while not doing too much harm to the neighbors, collectors would rather just steal part of the fish. Moral dilemmas activate a system responsible for specific values (honor, justice, mutual aid, etc.). The value, in turn, suggests a solution. Reciprocity is related to cognitive systems of social exchange. Suppose a forager remembers that he was helpful to his neighbor last week, and her response is to be mean. The cognitive system might suggest that he is entitled to more fish than he gets. Another Special Data set of rules altruism says it is necessary to take care of relatives even if they don't reciprocate. And the fact that collectors are just unfortunate activates the cognitive systems responsible for risk allocation. In this case, the gatherer will conclude that he should get help from other fishermen. Moral compromise systems have the ability to weigh conflicting moral obligations and make intuitive decisions. Collectors face a dilemma. The duty to help the brother conflicts with the duty not to harm the neighbor. His system of moral compromise must find a balance between these obligations and find the most correct solution. For example, he decides to steal three out of ten fish This is an optimal solution that reduces (but not minimizes) his brother's recovery time without causing major damage to his neighbors.
|
|